Turkey’s Crypto Regulation Overhaul: From Payment Ban to Full‑Scale Framework

Turkey’s Crypto Regulation Overhaul: From Payment Ban to Full‑Scale Framework
Amber Dimas

Turkey Crypto Licensing Cost Calculator

Calculate Your Minimum Capital Requirements

Enter current exchange rate to calculate the minimum capital required for crypto service providers in Turkey according to Law No. 7518.

The minimum capital requirement for a crypto exchange is TRY 150 million (≈ $4.1 million).
This meets Law No. 7518 requirements under the Turkish Capital Markets Board (CMB) licensing framework.

Important: These figures represent the minimum requirements established by Law No. 7518. Actual operational costs may vary based on business model and security requirements.

In July 2025 Turkey blocked 46 unlicensed crypto exchanges in a single day - a move that shocked traders and highlighted how fast the country has shifted from a permissive stance to a tightly controlled ecosystem. Turkey crypto regulation now hinges on a set of laws, licensing requirements and three watchdog agencies that together create one of the most comprehensive crypto oversight models outside the EU.

From a Wild West to a Structured Market

Until April 2021 the Turkish Central Bank’s only directive was a ban on using crypto for payments, while buying, holding and trading remained legal. That split‑screen approach was the seed for today’s full‑scale framework. The turning point came with Law No. 7518 - formally titled the “Law on Amendments to the Capital Markets Law” - which entered parliament on 17 May 2024 and became law on 26 June 2024. The law introduced the first legal definitions for terms such as “wallet,” “cryptoasset,” “cryptoasset service provider” (CASP) and “cryptoasset custody service.”

From that moment forward, any entity wishing to operate an exchange, a custodial service or a trading platform must obtain a licence from the Turkish Capital Markets Board (CMB). The minimum capital thresholds are steep: TRY 150 million (≈ $4.1 million) for exchanges and TRY 500 million (≈ $13.7 million) for custodians. By July 2024 the new regime replaced a patchwork of informal guidelines and gave the government a clear lever to shape the market.

Three Regulators, One Goal

Capital Markets Board (CMB) serves as the primary regulator overseeing crypto‑asset service providers, issuing licences, setting reporting standards and imposing sanctions.

Financial Crimes Investigation Board (MASAK) enforces anti‑money‑laundering (AML) rules, can freeze crypto accounts and conducts ongoing audits of licensed operators.

Scientific and Technological Research Council of Türkiye (TÜBİTAK) checks technical compliance, ensuring that CASPs meet security and infrastructure standards.

These three bodies together cover legal, financial‑crime and technical dimensions, creating a “tri‑party” supervision model that few other jurisdictions match.

Law No. 7518: What It Actually Requires

  • Formal definition of a crypto‑asset and a wallet, removing previous ambiguity.
  • Mandatory licensing for any platform that offers trading, custody or brokerage services.
  • Capital requirements (TRY 150 M for exchanges, TRY 500 M for custodians).
  • AML/KYC thresholds: transactions above TRY 15,000 (~$425) must undergo rigorous identity verification.
  • Regular reporting to CMB - including cancelled or unexecuted orders.
  • Heavy penalties for non‑compliance, ranging from fines to criminal prosecution.

Compliance is not optional; the law’s enforcement arm, MASAK, began full‑scale audits in February 2025 and has already frozen dozens of accounts suspected of illicit activity.

Three regulators—CMB, MASAK, TÜBİTAK—meet over a table of licensing documents in a retro‑anime office.

Comparing Turkey’s Model to Other Major Jurisdictions

Regulatory Landscape: Turkey vs. EU (MiCA) vs. United States vs. China
Aspect Turkey EU (MiCA) USA China
Legal status of trading Legal with licence Legal with licence Legal; fragmented agencies Completely banned
Crypto payments Prohibited Allowed under AML rules Allowed, state‑level restrictions Prohibited
Licensing authority CMB (single regulator) National competent authorities SEC, CFTC, FinCEN (multiple) None - outright ban
Capital requirement for exchanges TRY 150 M (~$4.1 M) €5 M minimum No uniform minimum N/A
AML/KYC threshold TRY 15,000 (~$425) €10 000 Varies by state N/A

The table shows that Turkey sits somewhere between the EU’s balanced approach and China’s outright ban, while offering clearer, single‑point oversight than the United States.

Real‑World Impact: Exchanges, Users, and Enforcement

One of the most high‑profile cases involved ICRYPEX, a domestic exchange that dominated Turkish volume. In July 2025 its founder was detained on allegations that crypto funds were used to finance criticism of the government. The case signaled that regulatory tools can also serve political purposes.

At the same time, the crackdown on unlicensed platforms forced users to migrate to the few remaining licensed exchanges. When authorities blocked 46 unlicensed services-including popular DEXs like PancakeSwap-traders reported sudden loss of access to certain token pairs and a surge in support tickets for verification delays.

Licensed users, however, note a tangible upside: stronger consumer protection, regular audits, and a clearer path to dispute resolution. Many say their accounts now feel “safer” even though the paperwork for large transactions can be tedious.

What It Takes to Get Licensed

Becoming a Crypto Asset Service Provider in Turkey is a multi‑step process that can take six to twelve months:

  1. Form a legal entity and raise the required capital (TRY 150 M for exchanges, TRY 500 M for custodians).
  2. Submit a detailed business plan to the CMB, covering technology stack, AML/KYC procedures, and risk‑management policies.
  3. Undergo a technical audit by TÜBİTAK to certify that security controls meet national standards.
  4. Obtain an AML licence from MASAK, including the appointment of a compliance officer and the implementation of real‑time transaction monitoring.
  5. Pass a final CMB review, after which a licence is granted and the platform can launch.

Ongoing obligations include monthly transaction reports, annual audits, and immediate notification of any suspicious activity. Failure to comply can result in fines up to TRY 2 million or suspension of the licence.

Bright, orderly crypto exchange interior with glowing "Licensed" signs and satisfied users.

Future Directions: Upcoming Bills and Industry Outlook

Legislators are already drafting amendments that would give MASAK broader authority to freeze crypto accounts without a prior court order, tighten stable‑coin transfer limits and raise the AML transaction threshold to TRY 30 000. The proposals align with FATF recommendations and suggest that the regulatory trajectory will keep moving toward stricter oversight.

Despite the hurdles, the Turkish market remains vibrant: surveys show over 20 % of adults own some form of digital asset, and trading volume continues to climb. Analysts predict that licensed exchanges will capture 70‑80 % of market share as illegal platforms are squeezed out, leading to a more stable but less competitive environment.

For global firms eyeing the Turkish market, the key is to partner with local compliance advisors who understand both the legal language of Law No. 7518 and the practical nuances of navigating CMB, MASAK and TÜBİTAK processes.

Key Takeaways

  • Turkey’s crypto regime shifted from a payment ban (2021) to a full licensing framework (2024‑2025) under Law No. 7518.
  • All crypto‑asset service providers must obtain a CMB licence and meet high capital thresholds.
  • Three regulators - CMB, MASAK and TÜBİTAK - share oversight of legal, AML and technical compliance.
  • Enforcement is aggressive: 46 unlicensed exchanges blocked in July 2025, high‑profile arrests, and frequent AML audits.
  • Future bills may raise AML limits and give MASAK broader freezing powers, signaling continued tightening.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Law No. 7518 and why does it matter?

Law No. 7518, enacted in June 2024, formally defines crypto‑assets, wallets and service providers in Turkey. It creates a licensing regime, sets capital requirements and mandates AML/KYC thresholds, turning a loosely‑regulated market into a structured, government‑overseen ecosystem.

Can I still use cryptocurrency for payments in Turkey?

No. The Central Bank’s ban on crypto payments remains in force. You can trade or hold digital assets on a licensed exchange, but using them to buy goods or services is prohibited.

What are the capital requirements for a new exchange?

An exchange must raise at least TRY 150 million (about $4.1 million). Custodial services face a higher bar of TRY 500 million (~$13.7 million). These funds must be fully deposited before the CMB grants a licence.

How does MASAK enforce AML rules?

MASAK requires identity verification for any transaction above TRY 15 000, conducts real‑time monitoring, and can freeze crypto wallets linked to suspicious activity without a prior court order, though recent drafts aim to expand this power.

Will foreign crypto platforms be allowed to serve Turkish users?

Only if they obtain a CMB licence and comply with Turkish AML/KYC standards. The government actively blocks unlicensed foreign exchanges, as seen in the July 2025 crackdown.

10 Comments:
  • James Williams, III
    James Williams, III July 4, 2025 AT 20:48

    The Turkish Capital Markets Board (CMB) has essentially become the gatekeeper for any crypto‑asset service provider operating in the country.
    Under Law No. 7518, firms must marshal a minimum capital base of TRY 150 million for exchanges or TRY 500 million for custodians before the CMB even entertains a licence application.
    This capital buffer, coupled with mandatory AML/KYC protocols enforced by MASAK, raises the compliance bar far above what we saw in most emerging markets a few years ago.
    From a technical standpoint, TÜBİTAK’s audit checklist now mandates hardware security modules, multi‑signature custodial wallets, and regular penetration testing.
    For a startup, the upfront cost of assembling a compliant tech stack can easily eclipse USD 500 k, not to mention the legal counsel fees to interpret the nuanced statutory language.
    Nevertheless, the upside is that once licensed, an exchange gains access to the official clearing‑house infrastructure and can offer fiat on‑ramps that were previously restricted to banks.
    Moreover, the reporting cadence-monthly transaction snapshots, cancelled order logs, and real‑time suspicious activity alerts-creates a data trail that auditors and regulators can parse with relative ease.
    Traders have reported that the perceived “safety net” provided by the tri‑party supervision model translates into lower spreads on major pairs during volatile market phases.
    On the flip side, the stringent anti‑money‑laundering thresholds (TRY 15 000) mean that retail users must endure identity verification for virtually every medium‑sized trade.
    The MASAK’s recent power to freeze wallets without a prior court order, while controversial, underscores the state’s commitment to curbing illicit flows.
    In practice, this has led to a modest but noticeable reduction in rapid “pump‑and‑dump” schemes that flourished on unlicensed DEXs.
    International firms eyeing Turkey now often partner with local compliance boutiques to navigate the multilayered approval process efficiently.
    These boutiques specialize in preparing the CMB business plan, coordinating TÜBİTAK’s technical audit, and aligning AML procedures with MASAK expectations.
    The overall regulatory trajectory suggests that future amendments may raise the capital thresholds and expand MASAK’s freezing powers, so firms should future‑proof their governance frameworks.
    In short, the Turkish regime offers a rare blend of legal clarity, technical oversight, and enforcement vigor that, while demanding, can be a launchpad for serious market players.
    Keep an eye on upcoming legislation that could tweak AML limits to TRY 30 000; early adaptation will be key to staying compliant and competitive.

  • Patrick Day
    Patrick Day July 5, 2025 AT 19:13

    Looks like the government just turned the whole crypto scene into a massive surveillance tool. Every transaction over a few bucks now needs a full background check, and they’ve got three different agencies poking around your wallet. It’s like they’re building a digital panopticon, and we’re all the subjects. The law sounds friendly on paper, but the real goal is total control of capital flows. Anyone thinking about keeping crypto private should start packing their keys.

  • Ryan Steck
    Ryan Steck July 5, 2025 AT 19:15

    yeah right, you think they’re just watchin some random people? they already froze dozens of accounts – that’s not a "surveillance tool" it’s a full‑on money grab! they want to freeze all our wallets so they can steal our crypto and claim it’s for "security". this is what i call a power trip, and we ain’t gonna let them get away with it.

  • Donnie Bolena
    Donnie Bolena July 6, 2025 AT 18:16

    Wow, this is actually pretty exciting!! If you think about it, a clear regulatory framework can bring a lot of confidence to the market!!! Licenced exchanges can finally focus on innovation instead of dodging legal bullet holes!!! Sure, the capital requirements are steep, but that just means only the serious players will survive – and those are the ones who will push the tech forward!!! Let’s keep an eye on the upcoming bills – they might just make the ecosystem even stronger!!!

  • Elizabeth Chatwood
    Elizabeth Chatwood July 6, 2025 AT 18:18

    Totally love the energy here but just a heads up – the new AML rules are a real pain for everyday users. definetly makes the process slower and many folks are complaining about the verification delays. Still, staying compliant is better than getting your account frozen.

  • Tom Grimes
    Tom Grimes July 7, 2025 AT 17:53

    I think it’s important to look at the human side of all this regulation. People who have been trading crypto for years suddenly find themselves in an unfamiliar maze of forms and capital thresholds. The emotional toll can be significant, especially when you see your favorite exchange being shut down overnight. Many users feel a sense of loss, as if a community they built is being dismantled by paperwork. The compliance audits, while necessary, often feel like they’re watching over every move you make. It’s not just about numbers; it’s about trust and the feeling that your digital assets are safe. In the end, a balanced approach that protects users without crushing enthusiasm would be ideal.

  • Jireh Edemeka
    Jireh Edemeka July 7, 2025 AT 17:56

    Oh, look, another heartfelt plea about regulation. How original. The reality is that these rules are here to weed out the riff‑raff and let the well‑funded players dominate. If you’re not prepared to meet TRY 150 million, you might as well stay out of the game.

  • Lindsey Bird
    Lindsey Bird July 8, 2025 AT 17:30

    This whole thing is a total circus!

  • Ty Hoffer Houston
    Ty Hoffer Houston July 8, 2025 AT 17:33

    It’s understandable why people feel outraged – the sudden crackdown definitely shook the community. At the same time, having clear rules could bring long‑term stability for everyone involved.

  • BRIAN NDUNG'U
    BRIAN NDUNG'U July 9, 2025 AT 17:06

    Dear colleagues, let us recognize the challenges posed by the new Turkish framework as opportunities for professional growth. By adhering to the prescribed capital and compliance thresholds, firms can demonstrate robust governance and inspire confidence among investors. I encourage all stakeholders to engage proactively with CMB, MASAK, and TÜBİTAK to ensure seamless integration of best practices. Together, we can foster a resilient market that balances innovation with regulatory certainty.

Write a comment