Thailand Bans Foreign P2P Crypto Platforms in 2025 Regulatory Crackdown

Amber Dimas

Crypto Asset Transfer Calculator

Transfer Impact Calculator

Calculate estimated fees and time when moving crypto assets from banned foreign exchanges to licensed Thai platforms as per Thailand's 2025 regulatory crackdown.

Crypto Amount

Source Platform Banned Foreign Platform (Bybit, OKX, etc.) Licensed Thai Exchange (Bitkub, Satang Pro)

Destination Platform Banned Foreign Platform (Bybit, OKX, etc.) Licensed Thai Exchange (Bitkub, Satang Pro)

Calculate Transfer Impact

Based on Thailand's 2025 regulations requiring licensed exchanges only. Fees reflect current industry standards.

Estimated Transfer Fee -

Estimated Processing Time -

Total Received -

On June 28, 2025, five major foreign cryptocurrency exchanges-Bybit, 1000X, CoinEx, OKX, and XT.COM-were completely blocked in Thailand. No warning. No grace period beyond a one-month notice. Just a hard stop. This wasn’t a random enforcement action. It was the final step in a carefully planned regulatory shutdown targeting unlicensed foreign peer-to-peer (P2P) crypto platforms operating in Thailand. The Thai Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) didn’t just tighten rules. They rewrote them.

Why Thailand Moved So Hard

Thailand didn’t ban crypto. It banned unlicensed foreign platforms. The difference matters. Trading crypto is still legal in Thailand-but only through exchanges that hold a Thai SEC license. Foreign platforms like Bybit and OKX had been serving Thai users for years without ever applying for a license. They operated in a gray zone: accessible, popular, and legally exposed.

The SEC’s main concern? Money laundering and online scams. According to official reports, unregulated P2P platforms were being used to move stolen funds, run phishing schemes, and launder proceeds from fraud. With no KYC checks, no transaction reporting, and no accountability, these platforms became magnets for criminals. The Thai government estimated that over 60% of crypto-related financial crimes in 2024 originated from unlicensed foreign platforms.

The response was swift. In April 2025, the Thai Cabinet approved two Royal Decrees. The first, the Royal Decree on the Operation of Digital Asset Businesses (No. 2), made it illegal for any foreign crypto platform to target Thai users without a license. The second, the Royal Decree on Measures to Prevent and Suppress Technology Crimes (No. 2), gave the Ministry of Digital Economy and Society (MDES) the power to block websites without a court order. That last part was key. No more waiting for judges. If a platform was flagged, MDES could shut it down in hours.

Who Got Blocked and Why

The five blocked platforms weren’t chosen randomly. They were the most popular among Thai users. Bybit and OKX alone had over 1.2 million active Thai accounts combined. CoinEx and XT.COM were growing fast, especially among younger traders looking for low fees and high leverage. 1000X, a lesser-known but aggressive P2P broker, was flagged for facilitating anonymous cash trades with no identity verification.

All five shared the same violation: they operated as digital asset exchanges under Thailand’s Digital Asset Business Act but refused to register. They claimed they weren’t targeting Thai users. But their websites were in Thai, they ran ads on Line and Facebook Thailand, and their customer support responded to Thai-language queries. The SEC called it “de facto targeting.” The courts agreed.

The shutdown wasn’t just about blocking websites. The SEC also ordered Thai banks and telecom providers to cut off payment channels to these platforms. If you tried to deposit money via PromptPay or AIS Wallet to Bybit after June 28, the transaction was automatically rejected. Your bank could even be held liable if they ignored repeated warnings about suspicious activity.

The One-Month Deadline That Caused Chaos

On May 29, 2025, the SEC announced the ban would take effect on June 28. One month to move your assets. Sounds fair? For most, it wasn’t.

Thousands of users had large holdings on these platforms-some with over 5 million baht ($140,000 USD). With no official withdrawal window and no guidance on how to safely transfer assets to licensed exchanges, panic set in. Reddit threads filled with posts like: “Can I withdraw to a cold wallet before the block?” and “Is my USDT stuck forever?”

Many rushed to withdraw. Others waited too long. Reports emerged of users losing access to funds when platforms suddenly froze withdrawals days before the deadline. Some claimed they were locked out after attempting to move large sums. The SEC didn’t intervene. Their stance: “It’s your responsibility to use licensed platforms.”

The result? A wave of crypto withdrawals flooded Thai-licensed exchanges like Bitkub and Satang Pro. Bitkub’s daily trading volume jumped 300% in the final week of June. But even licensed exchanges struggled. Their servers crashed. Customer support lines were overwhelmed. The system wasn’t built for this kind of sudden influx.

What Happens to Your Crypto Now

If you held crypto on one of the banned platforms, you had two options: withdraw before June 28, or lose access. There was no third option. No government bailout. No recovery fund.

The SEC didn’t help users move funds. They didn’t provide tools or instructions. They only warned: “Use licensed exchanges.” That meant if you had Bitcoin on OKX, you had to move it to Bitkub or another Thai-licensed platform before the deadline. Once the block was in place, the only way to access your assets was through the original platform’s website-which was now unreachable from Thailand.

Some users tried using VPNs to log in. That’s risky. Under the new Technology Crimes Decree, using a VPN to access banned platforms can be considered aiding illegal activity. Fines of up to 300,000 baht ($8,700 USD) or up to three years in prison apply to anyone operating or assisting unlicensed platforms.

The message was clear: if you want to trade crypto in Thailand, you play by Thai rules.

Thailand’s Double Game: Ban Foreigners, Back Local Innovation

Here’s the twist: Thailand didn’t shut down crypto. It doubled down on its own version.

While foreign platforms were being blocked, the government was quietly building its own digital asset infrastructure. On May 13, 2025, Thailand announced plans to issue up to 5 billion baht ($150 million) in government-backed digital tokens called “G Tokens.” These aren’t cryptocurrencies. They’re digital bonds-backed by Thai treasury debt-designed to be traded on a blockchain platform operated by the Bank of Thailand.

The goal? To modernize public debt issuance and reduce reliance on traditional banking systems. The government also announced plans for a blockchain-based securities trading platform for Thai companies. Local startups are getting funding and regulatory sandboxes to build compliant DeFi tools.

It’s a controlled experiment: ban the wild west, but build the future yourself.

How This Affects Business and Cross-Border Payments

The ban didn’t just hurt traders. It hit businesses too.

Thai companies that used foreign P2P platforms to pay freelancers in India, Vietnam, or the Philippines now face major delays. Before the ban, they’d send crypto directly. Now, they have to route payments through Thai-licensed exchanges, which means converting crypto to fiat, then sending via wire transfer. That adds days to payments and fees of up to 5% per transaction.

Indian freelancers who used Bybit to receive payments from Thai clients now have to open Thai bank accounts or use third-party intermediaries. Many are switching to PayPal or Wise-both slower and more expensive.

The result? A growing friction in Southeast Asia’s digital economy. Thailand’s move has made it harder for businesses to operate across borders. It’s not just about crypto. It’s about how money moves in the digital age.

What’s Next for Thailand’s Crypto Scene

As of October 2025, Thailand remains one of the strictest crypto markets in Southeast Asia. But it’s also one of the most structured.

There are now 12 licensed digital asset exchanges in Thailand. All must follow strict AML/KYC rules, report all transactions, and keep funds in segregated accounts. The SEC audits them quarterly. Violations mean immediate suspension.

The licensed exchanges have seen a surge in users. Bitkub now has over 4.5 million registered accounts. Satang Pro reports a 200% increase in new users since June. But adoption is slow among older users. Many still don’t trust local platforms. They remember the 2023 Bitkub crash.

The government’s next move? A national digital wallet for crypto. A pilot program is underway to let citizens hold and spend G Tokens through a government app. Think of it as a digital cash system-but for blockchain assets.

The message from Bangkok is clear: you can trade crypto. But only if we control it.

Is This the Future for Southeast Asia?

Malaysia, Indonesia, and the Philippines are watching closely. All have seen rapid growth in foreign P2P crypto usage. All have struggled with scams. Thailand’s crackdown shows a path forward: enforce licensing, block unlicensed platforms, and build a domestic alternative.

But there’s a cost. Thailand’s move has alienated some of its most active crypto users. It’s created confusion. It’s made cross-border trade harder. And it’s raised questions about digital freedom.

For now, Thailand has chosen security over openness. Whether that’s the right call will depend on one thing: did it actually reduce crime?

Early data from the Thai National Police shows a 42% drop in crypto-related fraud cases in the three months after the ban. That’s significant. But it’s too early to say if the drop is permanent-or just a temporary pause.

What’s certain is this: if you trade crypto in Thailand today, you’re not just using a platform. You’re playing by rules written by the state. And there’s no way around them.

Thailand crypto ban foreign P2P crypto Thai SEC crypto rules Bybit blocked Thailand OKX Thailand ban

10 Comments:

• 

  Yzak victor December 8, 2025 AT 04:08

  Man, I get why Thailand did this. I’ve seen too many friends lose money on sketchy P2P sites. No KYC? No recourse? That’s just asking for trouble. But still… it’s wild how fast they moved. One month to move your life savings? No grace period? That’s brutal.
  
  Still, I respect the clarity. If you want to trade here, you play by the rules. No more gray zones. I wish more countries had the guts to do this instead of just talking about regulation.

• 

  Adam Bosworth December 9, 2025 AT 01:36

  thai govt just turned crypto into a prison yard and called it ‘security’ 😭
  
  they blocked bybit but let bitkub run wild? lol. same scams just with more paperwork. and now my friend who traded on okx for 3 years is broke bc he ‘waited too long’ like its his fault??
  
  they didnt even give a withdrawal window. just ‘uhh bye’
  
  also why are they suddenly pro-blockchain? ‘g-tokens’? sounds like a crypto pyramid with a national flag on it

• 

  Doreen Ochodo December 9, 2025 AT 13:14

  People are scared. That’s real. But this isn’t about taking freedom away-it’s about stopping predators.
  
  Imagine your grandma gets scammed out of her pension because some offshore site didn’t check IDs.
  
  Thailand chose to protect people. Not perfect. But necessary.

• 

  Billye Nipper December 10, 2025 AT 03:55

  ...I just... I can’t believe how many people lost everything...
  
  I know the government said it was their responsibility... but... what if they didn’t even know how risky it was?
  
  And now, the licensed exchanges are crashing... what does that say about how prepared they really were?
  
  I just feel so sad for everyone caught in the middle.
  
  It’s not just crypto... it’s trust...
  
  and now it’s broken.

• 

  Jon Visotzky December 10, 2025 AT 07:43

  so the government blocks foreign platforms but builds its own blockchain system... sounds like they’re just creating a state-approved crypto bubble
  
  and the freelancers in india and vietnam? they’re screwed now
  
  also did anyone else notice the 300% volume spike on bitkub? that’s not adoption, that’s panic
  
  and the vpn thing? yeah, you can get jailed for using one now
  
  so… crypto’s legal but only if the state says so
  
  weird world

• 

  Isha Kaur December 10, 2025 AT 08:15

  As someone from India who used Bybit to receive payments from Thai clients, I can tell you this has changed everything. Before, I’d get paid in USDT within minutes. Now, I have to wait 3–5 days, pay 5% in fees, and fill out forms in English I barely understand. It’s not just inconvenient-it’s unfair. Thai businesses aren’t losing money because of this, but freelancers like me are. We didn’t choose the platforms. We just needed to get paid.
  
  Thailand’s crackdown might reduce fraud, but it’s also shutting out honest people who never did anything wrong. Why not target the bad actors instead of banning entire platforms? Why not work with them to improve KYC? Why not create a bridge instead of a wall?
  
  I understand the fear of scams. But fear shouldn’t be the only driver of policy. There’s a difference between regulation and isolation. And right now, Thailand feels more isolated than regulated.
  
  And yes, I’ve had to switch to Wise. It’s slower, pricier, and more bureaucratic. But at least I can still feed my family.

• 

  ronald dayrit December 12, 2025 AT 03:34

  Let us not mistake authoritarianism for order. Thailand has not banned crypto-it has colonized it. The state now demands absolute sovereignty over digital value, not because it seeks to protect citizens, but because it cannot tolerate decentralized alternatives to its control. The G-Tokens are not innovation-they are the final act of centralization. A blockchain ledger, yes-but one where every transaction is monitored, every wallet traceable, every movement subject to audit by bureaucrats who have never held a private key.
  
  The irony is that the very people who fled fiat systems for crypto’s autonomy are now forced into a state-run digital cage, disguised as progress. The SEC did not shut down fraud-they shut down dissent. The platforms were not unlicensed because they were criminal-they were unlicensed because they refused to become instruments of the state.
  
  And now, the next generation will grow up believing that financial freedom is a privilege granted by the government, not a right. That is the true cost of this crackdown-not the lost funds, not the blocked IPs-but the death of the idea that money can exist beyond the reach of the state.

• 

  Roseline Stephen December 12, 2025 AT 06:32

  I’m not a crypto person. Never traded. But I’ve seen friends get scammed on those P2P sites. One guy lost his rent money. Another got tricked into sending cash to a fake buyer.
  
  So I get why Thailand did this. It’s not about stopping crypto. It’s about stopping the predators.
  
  Still… the way they did it? Harsh. No warning. No help. Just… ‘you’re on your own.’
  
  Maybe they could’ve given people more time. Or helped them move funds. But I guess they thought the message was clear enough.
  
  Now we wait and see if the fraud really went down.

• 

  Thomas Downey December 12, 2025 AT 20:29

  Thailand’s regulatory framework is not merely a legal intervention-it is a paradigmatic assertion of state sovereignty over emergent financial technologies. The decision to invoke Royal Decrees without judicial oversight represents a dangerous precedent in liberal democratic governance, even if the intent is ostensibly protective. The suppression of unlicensed platforms, while ostensibly targeting illicit finance, simultaneously extinguishes the very possibility of market-driven innovation in digital asset infrastructure.
  
  Moreover, the government’s simultaneous promotion of G-Tokens as a state-backed blockchain instrument reveals a fundamental contradiction: the state seeks to monopolize the infrastructure of value while prohibiting private alternatives. This is not regulation-it is nationalization by algorithm. The claim that this reduces fraud is empirically suspect; fraud migrates, it does not vanish. The real effect is the consolidation of financial power into a single, state-controlled node-a vulnerability in itself.
  
  One must ask: if the Thai SEC is so concerned with KYC and AML compliance, why did it not mandate licensing for foreign platforms two years ago? Why wait until the ecosystem had matured and become indispensable to millions? The timing suggests not public protection, but the elimination of competition for domestic platforms-Bitkub, Satang Pro-now flush with state-sanctioned monopoly rents.
  
  This is not the future of finance. It is the past: the centralized, opaque, and authoritarian model we thought we had left behind.

• 

  Tisha Berg December 13, 2025 AT 14:39

  Some people lost everything. That’s heartbreaking.
  
  But others were getting scammed every day.
  
  Maybe this was the only way to make it stop.