RBI Banking Ban Reversal: What Changed for Crypto in India After the Supreme Court Victory

RBI Banking Ban Reversal: What Changed for Crypto in India After the Supreme Court Victory
Amber Dimas

Before March 4, 2020, if you wanted to buy Bitcoin in India, you had to find someone willing to trade cash in person. Banks had been ordered to cut off crypto exchanges completely. No bank accounts. No UPI. No NEFT. No withdrawals. It didn’t matter if you were running a legitimate business or just buying crypto for yourself - the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) had made it nearly impossible to operate. That ban didn’t stop people from trading, but it made everything slower, riskier, and more expensive. Then came the Supreme Court decision - and everything changed.

How the RBI’s 2018 Ban Killed Crypto Banking in India

On April 6, 2018, the RBI issued a circular that told all banks and financial institutions under its control: stop dealing with anyone involved in virtual currencies. This wasn’t just a warning. It was a shutdown order. Banks had to freeze accounts of crypto exchanges like ZebPay, CoinSwitch, and Unocoin. Payment gateways stopped working. Even people who just held crypto couldn’t cash out their profits without jumping through impossible hoops.

The RBI claimed it was protecting consumers from fraud and financial instability. But here’s the thing - they never showed any real evidence that banks had lost money because of crypto clients. No major bank had collapsed. No customer had been wiped out by a crypto exchange failure. The RBI’s argument was based on fear, not facts. And the collateral damage was real. Startups using blockchain for supply chain tracking, remittances, or identity verification couldn’t open bank accounts either. Innovation in fintech ground to a halt.

The Supreme Court’s Landmark Ruling: Why the Ban Was Illegal

The fight didn’t end in boardrooms or press releases. It went to court. The Internet and Mobile Association of India sued the RBI, arguing the ban violated the constitutional right to carry on any profession or business. On March 4, 2020, the Supreme Court agreed - and struck down the RBI’s circular entirely.

Justice Rohinton Fali Nariman wrote the opinion. He didn’t say crypto was safe or good. He said the RBI had overreached. The court ruled the ban was disproportionate. If the RBI was worried about money laundering or market volatility, it could’ve used existing laws - KYC, AML checks, transaction monitoring - instead of wiping out an entire industry. The judges pointed out that no regulated bank had suffered losses from crypto clients. The RBI had no data to back up its claim of systemic risk. That’s why the ban was ruled unconstitutional under Article 19(1)(g).

This wasn’t just a win for crypto traders. It was a win for rule of law in India. For the first time, a financial regulator was held accountable for using fear to justify a blanket ban. The court made it clear: if you want to restrict a business, you need proof - not just suspicion.

What Happened Right After the Ruling?

Within days, crypto exchanges reopened their banking channels. ZebPay, CoinDCX, and WazirX started processing deposits and withdrawals again. Trading volumes jumped 300% in the first month. New users flooded in - not just speculators, but professionals, students, and small business owners looking for alternative ways to store value.

The number of active crypto users in India went from under 5 million in early 2020 to over 15 million by the end of 2021. By 2025, that number is estimated at 28 million. India now has the third-largest crypto user base in the world, behind only the United States and Nigeria. That growth didn’t happen because of government support. It happened because the courts protected people’s right to trade.

Vibrant Indian crypto exchange with traders cheering, shattered bank symbols, and neon crypto charts glowing.

Why the Government Still Doesn’t Like Crypto - Even After Losing in Court

The RBI didn’t give up. Former Governor Shaktikanta Das kept warning that crypto could destabilize the rupee, trigger capital flight, or undermine monetary policy. In 2021, the government floated a draft bill called the Cryptocurrency and Regulation of Official Digital Currency Bill. It proposed banning all private cryptocurrencies - mining, trading, holding - while launching a digital rupee controlled by the RBI.

But here’s the catch: that bill never became law. It disappeared from Parliament. No vote. No debate. No final version. And that’s still the situation in 2026. There’s no law banning crypto. There’s no law protecting it. It exists in a legal gray zone - legal to hold and trade, but not recognized as money.

The RBI still issues warnings. It still calls crypto a ā€˜high-risk asset.’ But it can’t stop people from using it. The Supreme Court’s decision is still binding. Banks can’t legally refuse to serve crypto businesses. Exchanges still operate. People still buy Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana every day.

What Crypto Can and Can’t Do in India Today

Let’s be clear: crypto isn’t legal tender in India. You can’t pay your electricity bill in Bitcoin. You can’t buy a car with Dogecoin. The rupee is still the only official currency. But you can legally:

  • Buy and sell crypto on Indian exchanges
  • Hold crypto in your wallet
  • Transfer crypto between wallets
  • Use crypto as an investment asset
  • Receive crypto as payment (though it’s not legally binding)
The only real restriction? Taxation. The government slapped a 30% tax on crypto gains in 2022, plus a 1% TDS on every trade. That’s higher than most countries. But it’s also proof that the government has accepted crypto isn’t going away - it’s just trying to tax it heavily instead of banning it.

Split scene: dark RBI chains vs. radiant crypto freedom, Supreme Court gavel breaking bonds in retro anime style.

What’s Next for Crypto in India?

The absence of clear regulation is both a blessing and a risk. On one hand, innovation keeps moving. New DeFi platforms, NFT marketplaces, and blockchain-based lending apps are popping up. On the other hand, investors have no legal recourse if an exchange gets hacked or shuts down. There’s no deposit insurance. No consumer protection.

Some experts believe the next big move will be a regulatory sandbox - a controlled environment where crypto firms can test products under RBI supervision. Others think the government will finally pass a law that allows crypto as an asset class, with strict reporting and licensing rules - similar to how the U.S. treats it.

One thing’s certain: the days of the banking ban are over. The Supreme Court made that final. The RBI can’t undo it. What happens next depends on whether India chooses to regulate crypto responsibly - or keep treating it like a threat instead of a financial tool.

How This Changed the Global View of Crypto Regulation

India’s story became a case study worldwide. Other countries that considered crypto bans - Thailand, Indonesia, Nigeria - looked at what happened here and hesitated. Why? Because the Indian Supreme Court showed that blanket bans don’t work. They hurt innocent businesses. They don’t stop crypto adoption. They just push it underground.

The ruling set a global precedent: if you want to regulate crypto, you need evidence. You need proportionality. You need to show that less extreme measures won’t work. That’s now the standard. And India, despite its contradictions, helped define it.

Is cryptocurrency legal in India in 2026?

Yes, cryptocurrency is legal in India in 2026. The Supreme Court’s 2020 ruling overturned the RBI’s 2018 banking ban, restoring access to banking services for crypto businesses. While crypto isn’t legal tender and can’t be used to pay for goods or services officially, Indians can legally buy, sell, hold, and trade digital assets without fear of criminal penalties.

Can I still use my bank account for crypto trading?

Yes. After the Supreme Court’s 2020 decision, banks are legally required to provide services to crypto exchanges and individual traders. Major banks like HDFC, ICICI, and Axis now allow deposits and withdrawals for crypto platforms. If your bank refuses, you can file a complaint with the RBI’s Banking Ombudsman - they’ve upheld this right repeatedly since 2020.

Why did the RBI ban crypto in the first place?

The RBI claimed cryptocurrencies posed risks to financial stability, could enable money laundering, and threatened the rupee’s dominance. They argued that the volatility and lack of government control made crypto dangerous. But they never provided data showing actual harm to banks or customers - which is why the Supreme Court ruled the ban was disproportionate and unconstitutional.

Is there a new crypto law coming in 2026?

No confirmed law is scheduled for 2026. The government’s 2021 draft bill to ban private crypto and launch a digital rupee was never passed. As of now, the legal status of crypto remains based on the 2020 Supreme Court ruling. Any new legislation would need to pass Parliament - and there’s no public indication that’s happening soon.

Do I have to pay taxes on crypto in India?

Yes. Since April 2022, the Indian government taxes crypto gains at 30%, with no deductions allowed for losses. A 1% TDS (tax deducted at source) applies to every crypto trade, regardless of profit. This makes crypto one of the most heavily taxed asset classes in India - but it also confirms the government accepts crypto as a taxable asset, not a criminal activity.

11 Comments:
  • Jennah Grant
    Jennah Grant January 6, 2026 AT 21:03

    The Supreme Court's ruling was a masterclass in constitutional restraint. The RBI's ban wasn't just overreaching-it was a regulatory overcorrection built on fear, not data. When institutions wield power without empirical grounding, they don't protect systems-they stifle innovation. This case should be taught in every law and economics course. Proportionality isn't a suggestion; it's a requirement under due process.

  • Dave Lite
    Dave Lite January 7, 2026 AT 17:22

    Bro this is why I love decentralized finance. šŸš€ The RBI tried to kill crypto with a sledgehammer and the courts said ā€˜nah, use a scalpel.’ KYC/AML already exist. Why torch an entire sector? Now India’s got 28M users and zero legal clarity? Classic. They’re taxing it like it’s a luxury yacht while pretending they don’t want it. šŸ¤¦ā€ā™‚ļø

  • Tracey Grammer-Porter
    Tracey Grammer-Porter January 9, 2026 AT 17:10

    So many people don’t realize how huge this was for everyday Indians. I know a student in Pune who started buying small amounts of ETH after the ruling just to learn. Now she’s teaching her neighborhood shopkeepers how to accept crypto for chai. It’s not about speculation-it’s about access. People just wanted to move money without begging banks for permission.


    And honestly? The 30% tax is wild, but at least it’s a step toward recognition. Better than the silence they had before.

  • jim carry
    jim carry January 11, 2026 AT 00:15

    YOU THINK THIS IS A WIN? THE RBI IS STILL OUT THERE SCARING PEOPLE. THEY’RE NOT GONNA STOP. THEY’LL FIND A LOOPHOLE. THEY’LL USE THE DIGITAL RUPEE TO TRACK EVERY TRANSACTION AND THEN CRUSH ANYTHING THAT’S NOT THEIRS. THIS ISN’T FREEDOM. THIS IS A SLOW MARCH TOWARD FINANCIAL TOTALITARIANISM. THE SUPREME COURT DIDN’T WIN-THEY JUST DELAYED THE INEVITABLE.

  • Don Grissett
    Don Grissett January 11, 2026 AT 03:38

    lmao the rbi is just mad they cant control it. crypto is just digital gold. people want it. you cant stop it. even if they ban it tomorrow, itll still be traded on p2p. the only thing they accomplished was making it more expensive for normal people. also why is everyone acting like this is some new thing? its been happening since 2017.

  • Katrina Recto
    Katrina Recto January 11, 2026 AT 19:17

    India’s 30% crypto tax is the most honest thing they’ve done. They don’t like it. They don’t understand it. But they know it’s not going away. So they’re taxing it like gambling. At least they’re not arresting people. That’s progress.

  • Tiffani Frey
    Tiffani Frey January 13, 2026 AT 17:19

    It’s fascinating how the legal precedent here echoes the U.S. v. Jones ruling on digital privacy-both cases rejected blanket authority in favor of targeted, evidence-based regulation. The RBI’s circular was a blunt instrument in a world that demands precision. And yet… the absence of clear rules creates its own vulnerability. Who protects users when an exchange vanishes? The court restored access-but left the guardrails missing.

  • kris serafin
    kris serafin January 13, 2026 AT 23:37

    India’s crypto growth is insane 🤯 From zero banking access to 28M users in 5 years? That’s not luck-that’s human demand. People don’t need permission to want financial freedom. The government’s tax is just them trying to monetize inevitability. šŸ’ŖšŸ’°

  • Jordan Leon
    Jordan Leon January 14, 2026 AT 13:50

    There’s a quiet irony here. The Supreme Court upheld the right to conduct business-but the state responded by imposing a punitive tax regime that effectively discourages participation while technically permitting it. One could argue this is a form of regulatory capture disguised as fiscal policy. The state does not prohibit; it burdens. And in doing so, it reveals its true stance: not opposition, but control.

  • Allen Dometita
    Allen Dometita January 15, 2026 AT 14:25

    Bro the fact that you can buy crypto on PhonePe now is wild. I used to have to meet people in cafes to trade cash. Now my cousin in Jaipur sends USDT to his cousin in Delhi to pay for rent. No bank involved. No paperwork. Just… done. The system didn’t die. It just went underground and came back stronger.

  • Brittany Slick
    Brittany Slick January 15, 2026 AT 15:00

    Imagine if every time someone tried to start a business, the government said ā€˜nope, we don’t like your idea’ and shut down their bank account. That’s what happened here. And the fact that people kept going anyway? That’s the real story. Not the law. Not the tax. The people.

Write a comment