Crypto Tax Calculator for India
Transaction Details
Tax Breakdown
There’s a lot of noise online about India banning non-custodial crypto wallets. You’ve probably seen headlines screaming "India to Ban Self-Custody Wallets!" or "Your Ledger Is Doomed!" But here’s the truth: India has never proposed banning non-custodial wallets. Not once. Not in any official document. Not even in a draft. What’s happening is far more complicated-and far more dangerous for users than a simple ban.
What Exactly Is a Non-Custodial Wallet?
A non-custodial wallet is your own digital vault. You hold the private keys. No exchange, no app, no bank has access. If you lose your recovery phrase, your crypto is gone. If someone hacks your phone, your crypto is gone. But if no one else controls it, no one can freeze it, seize it, or tax it without your permission. That’s the point.
Popular examples include Ledger Nano S Plus, Trust Wallet, Exodus, and MetaMask. These aren’t apps you sign up for-they’re tools you download and control. In India, over 18.7 million people use them, according to Statista’s October 2025 report. That’s nearly a quarter of all Indian crypto users. Why? Because after the WazirX hack in July 2024 stole $230 million, people stopped trusting exchanges. They wanted real ownership.
The Myth of the Ban
The confusion started in 2021, when India’s Finance Ministry floated a draft bill called the Virtual Digital Assets (VDAs) Bill. It initially said "all private cryptocurrencies shall be prohibited." That sounded like a ban on everything-including wallets. But the language changed. By 2025, the bill was rewritten to impose heavy taxes, not bans. Union Minister Piyush Goyal confirmed this on October 6, 2025: "There is no ban on private cryptocurrencies. There is taxation. That’s it."
So where did the "ban" story come from? From misinterpretation. The Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) in March 2023 told all crypto service providers-including those based overseas-to register as Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs). The problem? The FIU didn’t distinguish between custodial services (like CoinDCX or WazirX) and non-custodial wallets. Legally, they treated them the same. That’s not a ban. It’s a mistake.
Chainalysis found in September 2025 that this misclassification adds a 34% compliance cost burden on non-custodial wallet developers in India compared to places like the EU, where MiCA law clearly exempts self-custody tools. MetaMask doesn’t hold your keys. It shouldn’t be treated like a bank.
How India Actually Regulates Non-Custodial Wallets
India doesn’t ban non-custodial wallets. It makes them harder to use.
- 30% capital gains tax on every profit from crypto sales-even if you’re just moving from one wallet to another.
- 1% TDS (Tax Deducted at Source) on every crypto transaction over ₹10,000. This applies even if you’re sending ETH from your MetaMask to your Ledger. No exceptions.
- No INR on-ramps in most wallets. Only 3 out of 10 major non-custodial wallets support UPI. That means you have to buy crypto via P2P, then send it to your wallet. More steps. More risk.
- Unenforced compliance. The FIU has sent show-cause notices to 25 offshore platforms, including Trust Wallet. But how do you enforce KYC on a wallet you don’t control? You can’t. So users are stuck in legal gray zones.
Google Play’s October 2025 policy update made this clearer: custodial wallets must get licenses in 15+ countries to stay on the store. Non-custodial wallets? Exempt. Google knows the difference. India’s regulators haven’t caught up.
What Users Are Really Experiencing
Real people are feeling the pinch-not because they’re banned, but because the system is broken.
On Reddit’s r/IndianCryptoInvestors, users report:
- "I paid ₹28,000 in TDS on a ₹25,000 loss on CoinSwitch. Moved everything to Ledger. No more surprise deductions."
- "Tried sending ETH from MetaMask to Binance India. Stuck in pending for three days. No one told me why."
- "I spent ₹1,200 on a Ledger. Now I have to figure out tax software, backup my seed phrase, and convert INR through shady P2P traders. It’s not freedom. It’s a full-time job."
Trustpilot reviews for Exodus Wallet (India version) show 3.2 out of 5 stars. The good? "No account freezes." The bad? "No native INR support. I had to use a P2P middleman who charged 15% extra."
And the worst part? Tax tools like Koinly and BitcoinTaxes.in say 44.8% of Indian non-custodial users have made TDS errors-because the system doesn’t track transfers between wallets. The tax department expects you to manually log every transaction. That’s not regulation. That’s harassment.
Why This Matters Beyond Taxes
India’s approach isn’t just inconvenient. It’s dangerous.
When you force people to use P2P to buy crypto because their wallet won’t connect to UPI, you push them into unregulated, peer-to-peer deals. That’s where scams thrive. In 2025, Indian cybercrime reports showed a 67% increase in crypto-related fraud linked to P2P platforms.
And when you don’t clarify whether a non-custodial wallet provider is a VASP, you create legal chaos. If someone uses MetaMask to receive crypto from a scammer, are they liable? Can the FIU freeze their wallet? Can they be prosecuted? No one knows. That uncertainty is worse than a ban-it’s a trap.
What’s Changing in 2025-2026
There’s hope. On October 7, 2025, the Ministry of Finance released a draft amendment to the VDA rules that says: "Non-custodial wallet providers not facilitating fiat conversion shall not be classified as VASPs." That’s the first official recognition that self-custody is different from banking.
Industry analysts at BCG predict 68.3% of Indian non-custodial wallet providers will comply with this new guidance by Q1 2026. That means better documentation, clearer interfaces, and maybe-just maybe-UPI integration.
Dr. Rajesh Saraf, former SEBI advisor, wrote in his October 3, 2025 NITI Aayog paper: "India will formally recognize non-custodial wallets as user-controlled tools rather than VASPs by mid-2026." That’s not a prediction. It’s a roadmap.
But risks remain. EY’s October 2025 report warns that 32.7% of current non-custodial users could face retroactive tax claims if the government decides to interpret past transactions as taxable events. And with only 1,247 full Bitcoin nodes in India (vs. 14,852 in Germany), transaction speeds are 27% slower than global averages. Infrastructure is lagging.
What You Should Do Now
If you’re using a non-custodial wallet in India:
- Don’t panic. No ban exists. Your Ledger or MetaMask still works.
- Track every transaction. Use BitcoinTaxes.in or Koinly. Tag every transfer, even between wallets. You’ll need it for tax season.
- Use only wallets with UPI support. As of October 2025, only ZebPay Wallet, CoinSwitch Kuber Wallet, and Trust Wallet (India version) allow direct INR buys.
- Back up your seed phrase. IIT Bombay’s October 2025 study found 76.2% of user support tickets relate to lost recovery phrases. Write it down. Store it offline. Never screenshot it.
- Stay updated. Follow the Ministry of Finance’s VDA rule amendments. The next one could be the one that finally fixes this mess.
Non-custodial wallets aren’t going away in India. They’re growing. Adoption is up 22.4% this year. People are choosing ownership over convenience. The government is slowly catching up. But until they clearly separate custody from control, users will keep paying the price in time, money, and stress.
What’s Next?
By mid-2026, expect clearer rules. Wallets may start labeling themselves as "non-custodial" in the Indian app stores. Tax software will auto-detect wallet-to-wallet transfers. UPI integration will expand.
But the real test? Will the RBI finally stop treating every crypto transaction like a money laundering risk? Until then, the burden stays on you.
Is it illegal to use a non-custodial wallet in India?
No, it is not illegal. Non-custodial wallets like Ledger, MetaMask, and Exodus are fully operational in India. The government has never banned them. What’s restricted is the lack of clear rules around taxation and compliance. You can use them, but you must report all transactions and pay 30% tax on gains plus 1% TDS on every transfer.
Can the Indian government freeze my non-custodial wallet?
No. Since you control the private keys, no government or bank can freeze your wallet. However, they can track your transactions if you use a regulated exchange or payment gateway to buy crypto. Once your crypto is in a non-custodial wallet, it’s off their radar-unless you later send it back to a licensed platform, which triggers TDS and reporting.
Why can’t I buy crypto directly with UPI in my MetaMask?
Most international non-custodial wallets like MetaMask don’t integrate with Indian payment systems because they’re not registered as VASPs in India. Only wallets that comply with Indian regulations-like ZebPay Wallet or CoinSwitch Kuber Wallet-have UPI integration. Other wallets require you to buy crypto via P2P platforms, which carry higher risk and fees.
What happens if I don’t pay tax on crypto transfers between wallets?
The 1% TDS is automatically deducted when you use a regulated exchange or gateway. But if you transfer crypto directly between wallets (e.g., from MetaMask to Ledger), no TDS is deducted. However, you’re still liable for 30% capital gains tax on any profit. If the tax department audits you and finds unreported gains, you could face penalties, interest, and legal action under the Income Tax Act.
Are hardware wallets like Ledger safe in India?
Yes. Hardware wallets like Ledger Nano S Plus and Stax are completely legal and secure in India. They’re not subject to TDS or KYC because they don’t process transactions-they only store keys. The only risk is physical loss or theft. Over 1.2 million Indian users switched to hardware wallets after the WazirX hack in 2024. Ledger reports 98.7% protection against remote attacks.
Final Thoughts
India’s crypto policy isn’t about banning freedom. It’s about controlling what it can’t understand. Non-custodial wallets are the most decentralized part of the system-and the hardest to regulate. Instead of adapting the rules to fit the tech, regulators are forcing the tech to fit outdated rules. The result? Confusion, higher costs, and a growing black market for crypto on-ramps.
But users aren’t backing down. They’re learning. They’re using tools. They’re moving their crypto off exchanges. That’s the real story here-not a ban. A quiet revolution in ownership. And it’s only getting started.
